GCRA  OVERVIEW  FAQ  NEWS  ARTICLES  PHOTOS  REEF ISSUES  RESTORATION  PAPERS  LINKS 

 

 

14 May 2005

To: letters@newscientist.com
From: Dr. Thomas J. Goreau (goreau@bestweb.net)
Subject: Fiddling While Rome Burns
 

Dear Sirs,

      World Bank and International Coral Reef Initiative expert recommendations,  "Tsunami ravaged reefs best left to recover unaided" (New Scientist May 13 2005) is not just wishful thinking: by fiddling while Rome burns it will actually increase reef decline by preventing restoration of damaged habitat.

    In the recent Global Warming Conference in New York the opposite conclusions were reached by a team familiar with reefs in Indonesia, Thailand, Maldives, Sri Lanka, India, Seychelles, and Mauritius. We found that most Indian Ocean corals had been killed long before the tsunami by global warming, sewage, pollution, sediment runoff following deforestation, dredging and mining, new diseases, and use of bombs and poisons for fishing. Tsunami wave energy was focused onto very small areas, leaving most reefs unscathed. The tsunami had only relatively small impacts overall on reef degradation, or to needs for large scale restoration of reefs to protect fisheries, tourism, shore protection, and biodiversity.

   In contrast, the World Bank and ICRI have long pushed the agenda of the US and Australian Governments that reef damage is minor, is not due to global warming and other human actions but some sort of "natural" cycle, and "resilient reefs" will just bounce back all by themselves no matter what we do. This systematic misinformation has prevented developing countries from taking action that would make a difference.

  Their latest report continues this nonsensical tradition. It claims marine protected areas can save corals and fish, even though  they are in fact full of dead and dying corals being killed by factors beyond their control. Blaming the victim, they suggest that preventing fishing communities from eating will make the fish come back, but ignore the fact that habitat degradation is so severe almost everywhere that the carrying capacity for large and diverse fish populations has been lost.

        Once again, the World Bank and ICRI totally ignores low cost reef restoration methods that increase coral growth rates 3-5 times, increase healing from stress more than 20 times, increases survival from high temperatures 16-50  times,  can keep corals alive where they would die and grow new reefs in a few years where they cannot recover naturally, greatly increases fish and shellfish populations,  and quickly turned severely eroding beaches in the Maldives into growing ones. These methods are already being used in over 15 developing countries  (New Scientist, 06 July 2002), and cost far less than any engineering alternative, or the inaction the World Bank/ICRI study proposes. More information is available at: http://www.globalcoral.org

     The real crisis is not natural disasters, to which reefs are long adapted, but constantly intensifying global human pressures, to which they are not. Only active large-scale habitat quality improvement can bring back our corals and fish. If coral reef countries continue to be fooled by absurd recommendations from  World Bank and ICRI "experts" they will lose their only chance to save their marine resources, coastlines, and economies.

   Sincerely yours,

        Tom Goreau 

Dr. Thomas J. Goreau
President
Global Coral Reef Alliance
37 Pleasant Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
telephone:  617-864-4226, 617-864-0433  
E-mail: goreau@bestweb.net
Web site:     http://www.globalcoral.org